If there was no virus how can you have variants of it? First of all, if there was a real pandemic, why were there no excess deaths in 2020 to reflect that? Why did funeral directors say that during the height of the so-called pandemic the number of people passing through their funeral parlours never increased? But when the fake vaccine started rolling out at the end of 2020 into 2021, one funeral director said they had never seen anything like the numbers who were dying, and an American insurance company said deaths have now increased by 40%, in the very period of the fake vaccine roll-out. Then there's the Wuhan lab story which a lot of the alternative media has bought, that this virus was released either: (1) by accident, or (2) on purpose, from the highest level bio-lab in China - Wuhan, funded by Fauci's lab in America, the so-called Gain of Function of this virus so it could be passed from animals to humans. For a start, all the evidence that this COVID hoax was prepared for and planned for from way back to be played out now is overwhelming. If you take the "it was done by accident" scenario, these people sitting round a table plotted, organised and orchestrated this entire scam - but they forgot one thing: oh my god we forgot the virus, we better just sit here and hope someone's going to release it by accident. Oh look, they just have, what a stroke of luck. What a nonsense. And then you have the "it was released on purpose" alternative. You're creating a pathogen to impact the whole world. Yeah, okay. So, um, where are you going to release it? Well we thought we'd release it down the street from the lab, in Wuhan! But you don't think that other people are going to actually make that connection to Fauci because of the paper trail? No? If you were the Chinese authorities and you wanted to create a virus to foist upon the world for your own reasons, you wouldn't involve financial input from Fauci that's going to leave a paper trail all the way back to his department, you'd fund it yourself so that you have complete control over it and complete anonymity. Fake narratives are put out in the alternative media for those who question the other narrative and look for a conspiracy. So you give them a conspiracy, it's just the wrong conspiracy, while all the time the real conspiracy is missed, and that is: there is no virus, there never has been! Why has so much illusion had to have been going on to maintain that there is a virus, if there IS one? The cult has to make you believe in a virus because everything else comes from that. Whether you believe the virus was natural, whether you believe the virus was released by accident or whether you believe the virus was released on purpose, the common theme of all three is there is a virus. And if there is a virus there is something to deal with. Once you realise there is no virus there never has been a virus, the whole house of cards comes down, the game is over, because nothing at all in response to a non-existent virus is justified... masks, distancing, lockdowns, jabs... or variants. Many doctors say there can be no variant of something that was never identified in the first place.
Dr Andrew Kaufman explains what alleged 'variants' really are. He was interviewed about "Omicron" on GreenMed Info at besovereign.com, a platform that is not censoring doctors. Dr Kaufman is one of the most censored, vilified doctors on earth https://andrewkaufmanmd.com/which must mean he is on the right track. He says they never did the isolation procedure of the Wuhan virus from a sick person that they could say was a new virus! They did a tissue culture experiment which has been shown to be able to produce the same results even without any virus being present. It has been done before, by the inventor of the culture process, John Franklin Enders in 1954. Also last year virologist Stefan Lanka from Germany showed that you get the same proof of a virus even when there's no virus in the experiment. Can this finding co-exist with the narrative some hold who argue that there was a weaponised virus circulating, or does this finding cancel that out as a psy op? Dr Kaufman's answer is they just haven't isolated any virus, no natural one from bats and no proof that any was created as part of any bioweapons program. On every single occasion whenever Freedom of Information requests have been sent to governments and universities around the world there's been no scientific evidence that there actually is a virus. Dr Kaufman explained that it has all been a simulation done using computer modelling, either doing experiments in a computer OR by making pseudo viruses or things that don't exist in nature. They are not studying real organisms from the real world, only a manufactured version which they study in a laboratory and claim to be real, and then put forth these variants, to say they have certain clinical properties wanting us to believe they're tracking it in real time, to justify restrictions. The COVID jabs are causing massive harm in the population so they have come up with a new variant to blame that on and use as leverage to push mask wearing, mandatory vaccination and other agendas, vilifying people who refuse vaccination saying we are the reason everyone is dying. To explain what variants are, and what it has to do with a particle identified from someone in South Africa, Dr Kaufman explained how a sample was taken from someone's lung fluid who was sick who they thought had COVID and just assumed there was a virus there without separating the virus out from the lung fluid. They didn't even look for it. A sample of lung fluid was put into a test tube, they looked at every small strand of RNA in it, over 56 million strands, and a computer just put those together and created a genome they said was this virus! They this process according to a written published set of instructions they have repeated it around the world many, many, many times. The UK government boasted that just in the UK they have completed over one million SARS-COV-2 whole genome sequences, or sequenced over one million people (it's on their website). This is a computer making up millions of little bits of RNA. Basically they are calling our own genetic material viruses and calling viruses our own genetic material. They never once took any of these genetic sequences out of a virus particle that was isolated in a test tube, they extracted genetic material and just sequenced that. That's the way any organism is sequenced, and the way the Human Genome was sequenced. No virus existed so they had to do a simulation using a computer to construct a fake genome sequence out of your own RNA, RNA from all the bacteria and fungi and other organisms that are in your body. Every time they repeat this experiment they get a different result and call it a variant. This diagram is from the GISAID database where all of these so-called variants are catalogued. This new one is what they call an "in silico genome". They gave it the nomenclature "hCov-19".
They performed this five and a half million times. They designate them Greek letters. Delta. Omicron. They created vsv-based SARS 78 Cov-2 pseudo viruses that contain mutations. They took what they think is an animal virus, particles, removed the material inside, and replaced it with a spike protein gene that they synthesized in the lab artificially but it matches the variant sequence. They call that a pseudo virus, something they can't get from nature or from any living organism, and then they interact it in a cell culture with different antibodies to classify how transmissible or severe it is, and to say it might even be resistant to the vaccine. And use these bogus results to promulgate falsehoods to the public. Now they are saying three jabs aren't sufficient and Pfizer and Novartis will make a new vaccine. Something on a subatomic scale they need an electron microscope to render visible, they've never tried to look at any variant under a microscope or do physical experiments with it. It's only computer simulation. They say there are no tests for this Omicron variant but current SARS-COV-2 PCR 'diagnostics' continue to detect it! Several labs have indicated that for one widely used PCR test one of the three target genes is not detected and this test can therefore be used as a marker for this variant. They are saying here that normally in the PCR protocol there are three primers, if you have positive for all three then you have a positive test. They are saying that Omicron only is positive for two out of those three. If previously you have a negative PCR test, now they can call it a positive PCR test for Omicron. They didn't need to create a new test, they just found a way to convert negative results to positive ones and then say that it's this new variant. They have to increase the cases, they'll do it by converting those that would have been called negative before to positive, so they can call it a "variant of concern" to justify further lockdowns. Tricks, conjecture and zero scientific references. There's not one scientific paper published on Omicron at all. On PubMed there are references to some proteins called Omicron that are unrelated; not one thing about SARS-COV-2. This is the so-called phylogeny of Omicron in different places that it's at but it's all just more computer simulation. The image below is the spike protein from the Omicron variant with the colours representing the thirty mutations, supposedly. This is completely a computer simulation, taking computer simulation results and putting it into another computer that gives you a rendering. If you view this on their website, it is a 3D rotating pretty and sophisticated picture.
Even if you're a scientist or a doctor you see this thing rotating and it looks impressive. You think they did a lot, but really they did nothing and it means nothing. Doesn't reflect reality. This protein was not purified from virus particles and studied. There was no genome taken from purified new virus particles called Omicron. To summarise the Omicron variant: there was no known attempt to isolate anything organic or do a viral culture procedure, they didn't even create a pseudo virus in this case, there are no microscope images, no proof it exists at all in reality; discovered only by in silico genome sequencing which is a complete computer simulation; clinical properties only understood by computer modelling; there's no clinical test authorised, approved or available for purchase, no valid diagnostic test developed for COVID, Omicron or any variant, it is based on converting the negative PCR test that have two out of three primed as positive to now positive and creating cases out of nothing that get it classified as a variant of concern; when they declare an outbreak of Delta or Omicron they don't really have a scientific basis to say it, all they can do is the complete genome sequencing for every individual and see if it's the same but they don't do that, they cheat, taking negative PCR tests and making them magically become positive; and there are no scientific publications! Yet countries are locking down. Do an anagram analysis of Omicron we see that it would be moronic to be scared of it. Even if the PCR test could diagnose, with any diagnostic test you have to do a validation study as that's the gold standard way of identifying the condition you're trying to diagnose, say a viral illness, this would be finding if there's a virus in the person first and then other ratings and steps are required in the validation process in applying to the FDA to get approval for a diagnostic. No one has attempted to do this in applying for the PCR test or any test for COVID. They claimed they validated the test by synthesizing the sequences that they say correlated with the virus on a machine in a laboratory, showing that the PCR can detect those sequences, but that has nothing to do with diagnosing a disease. That just says the PCR can measure a certain sequence. DNA or RNA doesn't correlate with a person's disease at all, and that's what the inventor of the PCR test said, Kary Mullis. He also said that if you misuse the PCR test as they have been doing by using too many amplification cycles such as 45 or more when 25 is the limit, you could find any sequence. This is cheating. Even if Mullis were wrong, the validation study would still need to be done as the first step. Another big crime is that in May 2020 the US government removed the criteria for determining if someone died from a virus, you only had to have suspicion of a virus and could label someone as having died from COVID. How they want to use this is to turn the health system into a bio-surveillance system, it's all about the so-called vaccine passport for access to everything and that's the tip of the iceberg. They plan to turn this into a vehicle for all of your information: social credit system and your financial information with a central bank digital currency that freezes your assets if you have not had your latest booster shot, or you could be prohibited from using public transport to get to work. The way to resist this, to preserve your freedom and be part of the change and create a new way of living outside of this government tyrannical control, the first step is to SIMPLY NOT COMPLY! That is the most important thing. Any of the guidelines, don't follow them! If businesses require them, sue those businesses. If enough people do that then the whole thing will just shut down. It may mean making sacrifices, you may have to let your job go and change your career. If you think things will get back to normal if you just get this one shot or do this one thing, it's not going to happen. It is up to us to start creating our own infrastructure for ourselves, our own parallel communities and societies, and anyone who wants to leave the Matrix system they can come over. If you are mired in fear and pessimism, take a step back and you'll see we have an amazing opportunity to make our own humanity that's much freer. With people like this wonderful doctor, it's a blessing. He is trying to create educational and clinical platforms to bring in real true medicine and healing to the world, launching a true medicine university featuring leaders and researchers in these exciting fields, trying to find out what's really going on, creating a body of knowledge outside of the government funded research Matrix of allopathic medicine and cut-and-burn poison and, with the exception of a trauma surgeon here and there, by and large teaching people how to take care of their own health. His dream is to bring this True Medicine University about into this new era. The webinar for his True Medicine University will be on Saturday 8th January 2022. He has partnered up with Marcy Cravat at www.terrainthefilm.com looking at premiering a documentary called "Terrain" which appeals to people who are just starting to question things, released for a free screening for everyone in the coming new year. Dr Kaufman has had a run-in with law enforcement and his information is censored. Please share it. UPDATE: Dr Joseph Mercola has written an article that there IS a virus called SARS-COV-2. He supports the claims of journalist Jeremy Hammond that this virus has been isolated. Dr Kaufman dissected these claims.
Dr Tom Cowan MD, speaker and author of "Breaking The Spell", is a friend of Dr Andrew Kaufman. Dr Cowan said he and a group he is working with have asked 140 different health institutions around the world, the Canadian government, the CDC, the NIH, the New Zealand government, British government, health institutions in different cities and different countries...all of them said in writing "We have no record of any SARS-COV-2 being found in any person who has COVID." Dr Cowan said they asked the lead authors who produced the papers who claimed they found SARS-COV-2 in people with COVID and all of them said in writing they never isolated i.e. found any SARS-COV-2 in any fluid of anybody with COVID. A group of leading lawyers, activists, scientists, the biggest names who are fighting for health freedom were not happy with what Dr Cowan had to say and invited him to talk about this. They had two or three virologists there and a man who spent twenty years as senior virologist for the Chinese Centre for Disease Control in Wuhan and twenty years as senior pathologist at Yale University as the Head of Viral Laboratory Science. Dr Cowan's team asked this Yale expert if he agreed that no one has ever found a virus that causes disease in any biological fluid, and he said Yes. They asked him what is the theory that is causing disease then? The Yale expert answered: "There is not enough virus to find." They asked him if you mix the fluid of ten people with COVID would you then have enough to be able to find the virus? He said No. What about a hundred people? He said No. What about a thousand people with COVID? Would you have enough biological fluid from their lungs to find even one virus? He said No! They said what about ten thousand people? He said no there's not enough to find! So what are they talking about when they say "virus"? Here's how they do it: it is a process called a" viral culture" that started in 1954 with John Franklin Enders. From every single paper that Dr Cowan has read for the last two years, it's become apparent that they use a uniform particle that has a protein coat and a piece of genetic material inside (which should all be identical and there should be thousands of them). They take fluid from somebody they say has COVID and either centrifuge it or filter it which is not isolation, it's just to get some of the debris out. Then they take this liquid and mix it with calf's foetal serum and spread it on monkey kidney cells and observe what happens. They try to 'grow the virus'. If they just did that the virus wouldn't grow, though. So what they do next is take away the nutrients from the cells - it is called "Dulbecco's Minimum Nutrient Medium". Still nothing happens. So then they add in two antibiotics, gentamicin and amphotericin nowadays, two highly toxic kidney substances. Then what happens is the kidney cells break down into thousands of particles of all different sizes and shapes called the "cytopathic effect" otherwise known as CPE. The cytopathic effect is 'proof' of existence of the virus and that the virus causes disease! They mix unpurified snot with calf's foetal serum, spread it on monkey cells, poison the monkey cells, the money cells break down and they say that proves there's a virus. For the first time in sixty years, Dr Cowan and Dr Kaufman with Stefan Lanka the German virologist took it upon themselves to repeat this experiment. They reproduced the 'isolation' experiment. They took cell cultures, kidney cells, and grew them...and they were fine. They added calf serum and a little bit of antibiotics and they were fine. They took away the cells' nutrients and added the same amount of antibiotics that they do in all the 'isolation' experiments except they never added anything in from anybody who is sick, and they proved that the cells break down in that characteristic cytopathic effect 'proving that the virus killed the cells' even though at no time was a virus ever added to the mixture. The way Dr Cowan explained how they do isolation, the whole thing they do is nonsense, madness. Why are the medical people accepting this? Well the first pillar of virology is cytopathic effect, caused by the method they use to starve and poison cells. Then they show pictures of the 'virus'. 'Seeing the virus' is the second pillar. You don't see anything, what you see is when you starve and poison tissue it breaks down into little pieces, and that is not a virus. Papers going back to 1973 show identical pictures from kidney biopsies, lung cancers and all kinds of diseased states, and in 1973 the CDC held a conference saying "these little particles are actually not viruses, they are simply debris from the breakdown of tissue". The third pillar is "we took the cell culture that broke down into little pieces and put it in our computer and it reassembled the pieces and found the SARS-COV-2 genome". And that proves the genome is there. So Dr Cowan and his buddies took a cell culture that had no virus, and added pure RNA from yeast (with it being an RNA virus) and ran the program exactly the way the SARS-COV-2 program had been run. Lo and behold they came out with the genome for SARS-COV-2! Even though there was never any virus or any person with COVID anywhere near that mixture! Yup, you get the same result using RNA from yeast! Proving that the production of that genome is based on a complete artefact, completely antiscientific, illogical, irrational, contrived nonsense! Dr Cowan's next step was to show that you can find any RNA virus you want - measles, Ebola, Zika, HIV - by doing the same thing: just add yeast RNA and put it in a computer, it makes it in silico or imaginary. That's how it's done. What's the reaction of the medical and scientific community to Dr Cowan redoing their experiment and disproving everything they base their narrative on? Here's where we're at: they're in an altruistic cult. Fauci, CDC, MODERNA, they all say the injection "does not stop transmission"... ask them why they get injected? So that Aunt Bessie doesn't get sick. Humanity is in a worldwide virus cult. Whenever you are in a cult you stop thinking because it's more important you are accepted by the cult. If they say what Dr Cowan says they'll be shamed, ostracized, there's nothing worse for them and they'll fight to the death for that not to happen. You know what all cults end with? Death. Often by suicide. Doctors have been committing suicide. More than hundreds of billions of dollars have been put into their study of virology in the last fifty years. Dr Cowan fundraised for the cultures, yeast, drugs and picture-taking for an experiment that cost only $42,000 to disprove their virology.
Dr Mike Yeadon is one of the most credentialed medical professionals. This is his resume: Senior Principal Scientist at Wellcome Research, 1988-1995; virologist and former vice president of Pfizer 2005-2008; Head of Allergy and Respiratory Research Consultant on the Scientific Advisory Board, Pulmatrix, 2011-2017; Consultant at Apellis Pharmaceuticals, 2011-2016; co-founder of Ziarco, 2011-2017. He thinks our health leaders have abandoned science and reason. Dr Yeadon looked into what they were doing for diagnostics using the PCR test and spoke on thehighwire.com, a platform that gives him a floor to break down the lies. Dr Yeadon says the PCR test is a powerful technique but NOT a technique for diagnosing infections and he quotes Professor Kary B Mullis who won a Novel Prize for its invention, who told us this repeatedly. Professor Mullis who invented the PCR test said the PCR is separate, that it's just a process you use to make a whole lot of something out of something, if you do the PCR well you can find almost anything in anybody by amplifying one single molecule enough, it doesn't tell you that you're sick, is what he said. Dr Yeadon said it's good at detecting DNA or RNA. He could see bad actors operating in the testing, people working in the UK being sneaky, not using an internal standard, not having samples of the virus and refusing to disclose how many cycles they were using... you should use samples of the thing you are trying to detect...they weren't using these standards, and were using as much amplification as the machines could use, not appropriate to the amount you would use to work out if an infection were present... turning up the amplifications, over-amplifying, with no internal standards in use. The New York Times did their own investigation into the PCR test and found that every lab in America was running about 45 amplification cycles which is gigantic - anything found looks like a problem. Amplification means amplifying genetic material by doubling it in dozens of cycles, until you have billions or trillions of the original molecules, using a machine that reads: cycle, copies of the target DNA (goes into the trillions with the increase in number of cycles), and variable margin DNA fragment. If you have enough of the identified RNA fragment, then they use that for results, and you are considered 'positive'. They use a microscope, it can detect anything, a fragment of a dead cell... it doesn't mean you are infected. They worked out the relationship between those who 'had' SARS-COV-2 and those who didn't... they found that when they got a positive test within about 25 cycles it became more and more difficult to infect cells in a culture, that is when you try to infect a culture, when you grow the virus in cells. Dr Fauci himself said "You can never culture a virus from a 37 threshold cycle". He said "it's just dead nucleotides, period." From the horse's mouth. Dr Yeadon drew the line there at 25 or cycles in the mid twenties and said there's not enough virus there to make you infectious at all. And in the UK they were using 39, even 40 plus. Professor Carl Heneghan, Head of Oxford University, Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, said a cycle threshold above 35 generally is people who are not infectious, yet NHS England runs cycle thresholds of 45, which is identifying people who are not infectious. Each cycle doubles the amount of material - Dr Yeadon did the maths on this and the multiplication of material was about a trillion-fold. If you run very high cycles of one harmless molecule on a PCR test, you can end up with a false positive. A test that is declared positive attained by cheating circumstances, artificially inflating infection rates. What it doesn't do is tell you the person is clinically ill or infectious. We have ended up with fake cases by the thousands of millions around the world because of this. It produced a scare story that there were more cases than there really were. Dr Yeadon wrote a paper "The PCR False Positive Pseudo Epidemic" published 30th November 2020 and updated on 25th December 2020. It was the third of four papers that he wrote. He was one of more than twenty authors that wrote a critique of the test designed in the Corman-Drosten test from Professor Drosten in Berlin (who is part of it). That Drosten test was designed in such a loose way that everyone around the world would end up with an inaccurate test result that very often would show positive when there was nothing there. Jeffrey Jaxen an investigative reporter talked about the reference on the Drosten Report to the cycling: that if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles is used as is the case in most labs in Europe and the US , the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that the said result is a false positive is 97%! The test is 97% inaccurate! And the test is contaminated. Ex police officer Mark Sexton has reported this to police as an act of terrorism on the people and speaks about this
Christine Massey is a former bio-statistician who is known for issuing Freedom Of Information requests to various government agencies in the United States and elsewhere that show that according to CDC records there is no SARS-COV-2 virus sample that has been shown to cause any disease or infection. Christine spoke with Mike Adams in this interview. She says people have been looking in the public domain and not finding legitimate studies that match what's been asked for in FOI requests. After a year and a half of people from around the world submitting requests from 137 institutions in over 25 countries, no one to this day has provided even one record of the alleged virus having been purified from a patient sample. Not one institution has responded with any document showing the proof it has been isolated. When they say that they isolated the virus on their papers that are convincing, when you read the methods, it doesn't add up to any real evidence. Reading the methods of how they come up with a genome, it becomes apparent they work with a soup of genetic material from the patient sample or from the mixture from the monkey cells and the bovine foetal serum and allege to detect many gene sequences in that and that involves using PCR technology with many cycles, and they put all these sequences on a computer software to match, align and edit, that invents a pattern they call a genome.