The Royals, Prince Andrew and Epstein have been in the papers again. The business about Epstein was a blackmailing operation and Prince Andrew was caught in it, so he was on an interview with the BBC recently (November 2019),
and it was a disaster (Questions the BBC failed to ask ) Many publications described the interview as a car crash. It was always going to be. They're trying to explain away something sinister that they can't explain away, by making it 'unexplainable'. Of course they have to lie. In a situation like that the explanations must stand up, the lies had better be plausible...or the house of cards is coming down! But Andrew's lies were were pitiful. He said he can't sweat, doesn't hide in public and only wears a shirt and tie in London. In next to no time all these things were demolished with pictures of him! The house indeed has come down! What we are seeing now is a desperate attempt for survival by this horrific family and its institutions! It's clear he hasn't got much defense against what is being claimed. Massive allegations! There was the claim that he was with his children at a pizza restaurant on the day that Virginia Roberts claims that he had sex with her in London at the home of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was who was a close long-term friend of Prince Andrew. The timings he gives are not the timings when it was supposed to have happened. He said he was at home with the children because he and his wife had this rule that when one was away, one would be at home with the children. That was demolished immediately by it being pointed out when they were both away together! It has also been highlighted that in public situations the royals are followed by protection officers and these things are logged. So Andrew's whereabouts at the times in question must be provable by the security that logs the documentation. A member of the Royal Family trying to defend himself against claims as extraordinary as these would present documentation logs.. where are they? He failed to say that that infamous picture of himself with Virginia Roberts at Ghislaine's home was fake. Can't say it's a fake, he knows it's not. Instead, it's: "Oh we don't really know if it's a fake or not." Companies, charities, universities, all ditching Prince Andrew and the Queen has acted firmly! "Queen sacks Prince Andrew: Monarch summons distraught Duke of York to Buckingham Palace, orders him to step down from public duties and strips him of his £249,000 salary (which he gets for cutting ribbons and opening things and having a lovely life at the taxpayer's expense) amid fall-out with friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein". It was called "the Queen's decisive move". So, the Queen has "acted". Cut him off, no more royal duties. Stay quiet for a bit, keep your head down. The Queen has 'acted' because she's trying to stop the dominoes from falling which this situation has enormous potential to do, and will lead to their REAL background and REAL nature that is hidden from the public so that they can survive in power. However, the mainstream press say: "The Prince also said he would be willing to co-operate with any police investigations into Epstein who was on remand in New York accused of sex trafficking offenses when he died". Where are the British police? Nowhere. They decided some time ago they were not going to pursue this inquiry into Prince Andrew on allegations that have appeared in court filings in America that he had sex with a minor in a house in London. Attorney Lisa Bloom, who represents Epsteins slaves, has said she is "ready to subpoena Andrew and force him to give evidence in America but prosecutors would treat him as a witness to help prosecute Epstein's helpers and co-conspirators rather than as a criminal suspect." What?! One of Epstein's slaves is accusing him of having sex with her when she was a minor! "Andrew will lose his £249,000 annual income from the taxpayer funded Sovereign Grant" (where the Royal Family are handed an absolute phenomenal fortune every year by the taxpayer to live their life of luxury and privilege for no other reason than they were born into that family); the news report went on to say that cash will still come in from his mother's Duchy of Lancaster estate (more taxpayer money) the source of her multi-million private income. All these Duchies. The one in Cornwall gives Charles his life of privilege. The people should have the benefit of it! But no. One family. The Royal Residence in Windsor Great Park was gifted to him by Her Majesty in 2003 when he split from the Duchess of York, when the couple sold their mansion in Ascot to a billionaire oil tycoon who paid £15 million, 3 million above the asking price and then...demolished it! "And what do YOU do?" is a book by Norman Baker former MP. The book title is a line said by people meeting people in these royal visits. The book documents the extraordinary amounts of money that the British Royal Family suck out of the British population, and all the ways they manipulate he system to get even more money and wealth. Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, all countries of the commonwealth, if we have any self-respect, then this whole institution of divine right to rule by DNA is madness, insanity, bizarre, and it has to go! Not forgetting the alleged connections between Prince Andrew and the late alleged paedophile MP Lord Greville Janner. And Virginia Roberts accused Andrew of having sex with her three times when she was a minor. Ghislaine Maxwell's father Bob Maxwell once owned the Daily Mirror. Epstein was connected to the CIA. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's accusers reported that there were hidden microphones and cameras around his properties. This report came from an Epstein victim confirming Epstein had cameras in bathrooms and bedrooms at his New York townhouse and a team of men monitored the feeds at all times. Maria Farmer said: "The main thing I thought was interesting was he showed me where the men monitoring everything were. If you're facing the house there's a window on the right that's barred, that's the room, the 'media room' is what he called it. She also confirmed the existence of a secret door that was referenced by Virginia Robert". So how much does the Queen care about abused children, then? This is the same royal family and queen 'acting' regarding Prince Andrew, that was described recently by a news programme anchor or presenter in America on ABC in a tape that was leaked to the Project Veritas organisation. In that tape this presenter says (it was off-air, but recorded) that she "had the whole deal on Jeffrey Epstein three years" ago from people who claim to have been abused by him and been part of his child trafficking ring. She "had the lot" she said - Clinton, Prince Andrew, all of it - three years ago. And ABC would not let that be aired! One of the reasons for that, she was, was threats from...the British Royal Family! The Royal Family have been colossally exposed with FACT not assumption by researchers and information just keeps coming to the surface, with this scandal, and the Savile scnadal. Jimmy Savile was a disk jockey with the BBC. When he died in 2011 what came out in the wake of it was that he was a historic level paedophile. What didn't come out was that he procured children for the rich and famous AND he was also an inner circle member of the British Royal Family for decades and a close friend of Charles until death. . One of the biggest procurers for the rich and famous in America happens to be a close friend of Prince Andrew. In Britain we have a record-breaking paedo and procurer of children who is a decades long close friend of Charles, and an inner circle member of the royal family to the point where they had him acting as a mediator between Charles and Diana when their marriage was on the rocks. He's a disk jockey! But he was more than. that. Are we being asked to believe that royal connections to Epstein and to Savile who did the same thing on different sides of Atlantic is mere coincidence? Here 's another co-incidence. In Savile's own words he was introduced to the "inner sanctum" of the Royal Family in the 1960's by Lord Mount Batten - Prince Charles's mentor, and Prince Philip's to a degree - and he stayed there for the rest of his life. Why would Lord Mount Batten introduce a paedophile procurer of children to British Royalty? He was one. Exposed years ago. And recently someone wrote another book, it includes information, documents, from the FBI in which the FBI stated Lord Mount Batten was a paedophile. The police didn't question Prince Andrew. The police knew what Savile was doing. Some of those police covered up for him, but some were trying to nail him, but found that they couldn't get enough on him to charge him and get a prosecution. The police knew. The police special branch (who are the royal protection squad!) the MI5 networks, would have known, through all those decades, that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile and procurer of children. They knew! And so Savile carried on in the inner fold. And he was not just a paedophile and child procurer, he was a necrophiliac. He liked sex with dead bodies. That's why he famously volunteered as a porter at a Leeds hospital "'Ow's about that then, what a nice man that Jimmy Savile is" - no! He wanted access. to the mortuary! This death cult network that controls the system governing human society is obsessed with death, that's why they literally sacrifice people, especially children, in their Satanic rituals, this is why they glorify mass death rituals we call "war". And the British Royal Family are part of it. Why don't the mainstream media make these connections with Savile's history and all these paedophile and Satanic rings that connect, and connect the dots? The network of child abuse and satanic rings lock into Capitol Hill big time and into Westminster. Revelations about a Westminster paedophile ring came out. And they were connected to the Margaret Thatcher government, Margaret Thatcher being another close friend of Jimmy Savile! And throughout her time in the conservative party and as Prime Minister, one of her closest aids was Peter Morrison the MP for Chester, who was a KNOWN paedophile! Edwina Currie, a minister in Thatcher's government, wrote in her diary about the dangers to Thatcher of having a close aid in Morrison as he was a known paedophile. She describes how Norman Tebbitt the Chairman of the Conservative Party had a conversation with Morrison about being a paedophile! She said Morrison promised to be "discreet". So many researchers have been exposing all of these connections for such a very long time. Carl Beech was heralded as one such exposer, but was 'exposed' as 'fantasist'. The media then said "it was all fantasy". No it wasn't fantasy. Carl just said what all these other researchers have been saying for some twenty years. Evidence supports it very much now. But that's ignored, and instead we have all this 'woke' stuff going on, while we have a Head of State in Britain who is only permitted to come from one family bloodline. What is this family doing having all this power?? How is it that in Britain and many commonwealth countries their Head of State is chosen not by the people, it is chosen by a particular bloodline? "The Queen? She's got no power really, she is good for tourism." They have ENORMOUS power. Language and labels give it away: "Her Majesty's government"; "Her Majesty's most loyal opposition"; "Her Majesty's Civil Service"; "Her Majesty's Treasury"; "Her Majesty's Customs and Excise". "Her Majesty's Court Services"... SHE is immune to prosecution! "Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service"...yeah, that's where they should be. "Her Majesty's Passport Office"; even naval ships are called HMS, Her Majesty's Ship! When MPs get elected by 'the people', they cannot take office unless they pledge an oath of allegiance to the Queen. MPs have to say this: "I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors according to Law. So help me God". Not "I swear allegiance to the people who elected me". Those who refuse to take the oath are barred from participating in any proceedings and they won't receive their salaries. Under the Parliamentary Oath Act of 1866, any of the peers in the upper chamber of the House of Lords voting without having taken the oath are subject to a penalty, a fine of £500. Judges in Her Majesty's courts have to swear an oath to the Queen. The Armed Forces are "Her Majesty's Armed Forces" and at the end of the affirmation in their oath that they must swear to the Queen they have to say: "I will, duty-bound honestly and faithfully, defend Her Majesty". Not the people, not the country, no, Her Majesty... "against all enemies and will obey all orders of Her Majesty her heirs and successors". Oh, the family has got no power really. When football teams, crowds and other occasions sing the National Anthem, it is not to the country, it is to the Queen, demanding to be "reigned over". When people take an oath of citizenship: "I swear, by Almighty God, that on becoming a British Citizen I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II her heirs and successors according to Law" and the Scout Association aged 10 and over have to say: "I promise that I will do my best to do my duty to God and to the Queen". And the police...the police are "Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary", and before they can take up a post of employment as police officer they must swear this to the Queen: "I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of Constable". Have you noticed that they have not taken any proceedings against Prince Andrew lately, in the light of all the allegations of what happened in London? How many people, if they were not part of the Royal Family, would have had allegations like that made against them, and the police say "Oh no we're not going to do anything about it oh no"?? The Royal Family is a law unto itself and it's got to bloody STOP! Be gone with them. The House of Lords is part of the royal structure with appointees to oversee laws and legislation. They are appointed You can appoint a Lord by giving a wad of notes to a party. The whole system stinks. The whole ludicrous hierarchy is designed to serve the tiny few by exploiting the many. It's a no-no to turn your back on the Queen, you should never turn your gaze away from her for too long, and you can't start a conversation with the Queen, she has to start it. Meghan Markle who is "woke" has "woked" Prince Harry causing splits in the family...and with the situation with Prince Andrew and what happened with Jimmy Savile should we bring this in - and we should - the house of cards starts to shake. Do you know the Queen owns most of the seabeds off the British coast? She is making another fortune off of the wind farms. The Queen owns the whales, sturgeons, dolphins and porpoises captured within three miles of the UK coast. Then there are all the flunkies who are paid a pittance to help the royals get dressed. We are paying for it, and kids in Britain are going to bed hungry.