Face the facts about the Royals

The Royals, Prince Andrew and Epstein have been in the papers again.  The business about Epstein was a blackmailing operation and Prince Andrew was caught in it, so he was on an interview with the BBC recently (November 2019), 

and it was a disaster  (Questions the BBC failed to ask )  Many publications described the interview as a car crash.  It was always going to be. They're trying to explain away something sinister that they can't explain away, by making it 'unexplainable'.  Of course they have to lie.  In a situation like that the explanations must stand up, the lies had better be plausible...or the house of cards is coming down!  But Andrew's lies were were pitiful.  He said he can't sweat, doesn't hide in public and only wears a shirt and tie in London.  In next to no time all these things were demolished with pictures of him!  The house indeed has come down!  What we are seeing now is a desperate attempt for survival by this horrific family and its institutions!   It's clear he hasn't got much defense against what is being claimed.  Massive allegations!  There was the claim that he was with his children at a pizza restaurant on the day that Virginia Roberts claims that he had sex with her in London at the home of Ghislaine Maxwell, who was who was a close long-term friend of Prince Andrew.  The timings he gives are not the timings when it was supposed to have happened.  He said he was at home with the children because he and his wife had this rule that when one was away, one would be at home with the children.  That was demolished immediately by it being pointed out when they were both away together!    It has also been highlighted that in public situations the royals are followed by protection officers and these things are logged.  So Andrew's whereabouts at the times in question must be provable  by the security that logs the documentation.  A member of the Royal Family trying to defend himself against claims as extraordinary as these would present documentation logs.. where are they?   He failed to say that that infamous picture of himself with Virginia Roberts at Ghislaine's home was fake.   Can't say it's a fake, he knows it's not.  Instead, it's: "Oh we don't really know if it's a fake or not."   Companies, charities, universities, all ditching Prince Andrew and the Queen has acted firmly!  "Queen sacks Prince Andrew: Monarch summons distraught Duke of York to Buckingham Palace, orders him to step down from public duties and strips him of his £249,000 salary  (which he gets for cutting ribbons and opening things and having a lovely life at the taxpayer's expense) amid fall-out with friendship with paedophile Jeffrey Epstein".  It was called "the Queen's decisive move".  So, the Queen has "acted".  Cut him off, no more royal duties.  Stay quiet for a bit, keep your head down.  The Queen has 'acted' because she's trying to stop the dominoes from falling which this situation has enormous potential to do, and will lead to their REAL background and REAL nature that is hidden from the public so that they can survive in power. However, the mainstream press say: "The Prince also said he would be willing to co-operate with any police investigations into Epstein who was on remand in New York accused of sex trafficking offenses when he died".  Where are the British police?  Nowhere.  They decided some time ago they were not going to pursue this inquiry into Prince Andrew on allegations that have appeared in court filings in America that he had sex with a minor in a house in London.  Attorney Lisa Bloom, who represents Epsteins slaves, has said she is "ready to subpoena Andrew and force him to give evidence in America but prosecutors would treat him as a witness to help prosecute Epstein's helpers and co-conspirators rather than as a criminal suspect."  What?!   One of Epstein's slaves is accusing him of having sex with her when she was a minor!   "Andrew will lose his £249,000 annual income from the taxpayer funded Sovereign Grant" (where the Royal Family are handed an absolute phenomenal fortune every year by the taxpayer to live their life of luxury and privilege for no other reason than they were born into that family); the news report went on to say that cash will still come in from his mother's Duchy of Lancaster estate (more taxpayer money) the source of her multi-million private income.  All these Duchies.  The one in Cornwall gives Charles his life of privilege.  The people should have the benefit of it!   But no. One family.  The Royal Residence in Windsor Great Park was gifted to him by Her Majesty in 2003 when he split from the Duchess of York, when the couple sold their mansion in Ascot to a billionaire  oil tycoon who paid £15 million, 3 million above the asking price and then...demolished it!   "And what do YOU do?" is a book by Norman Baker former MP.  The book title is a line said by people meeting people in these royal visits.  The book documents the extraordinary amounts of money that the British Royal Family suck out of the British population, and all the ways they manipulate he system to get even more money and wealth.  Britain, Australia, New Zealand, Canada, all countries of the commonwealth, if we have any self-respect, then this whole institution of divine right to rule by DNA is madness, insanity, bizarre, and it has to go!     Not forgetting the alleged connections between Prince Andrew and the late alleged paedophile MP Lord Greville Janner.   And Virginia Roberts accused Andrew of having sex with her three times when she was a minor.  Ghislaine Maxwell's father Bob Maxwell once owned the Daily Mirror.  Epstein was connected to the CIA. Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell's accusers reported that there were hidden microphones and cameras around his properties. This report came from an Epstein victim confirming Epstein had cameras in bathrooms and bedrooms at his New York townhouse and a team of men monitored the feeds at all times.  Maria Farmer said: "The main thing I thought was interesting was he showed me where the men monitoring everything were.  If you're facing the house there's a window on the right that's barred, that's the room, the 'media room' is what he called it.  She also confirmed the existence of a secret door that was referenced by Virginia Robert".    So how much does the Queen care about abused children, then?  This is the same royal family and queen 'acting' regarding  Prince Andrew, that was described recently by a news programme anchor or presenter in America on ABC in a tape that was leaked to the Project Veritas organisation.  In that tape this presenter says (it was off-air, but recorded) that she "had the whole deal on Jeffrey Epstein three years" ago from people who claim to have been abused by him and been part of his child trafficking ring.  She "had the lot" she said - Clinton, Prince Andrew, all of it - three years ago.  And ABC would not let that be aired!  One of the reasons for that, she was, was threats from...the British Royal Family!  The Royal Family have been colossally exposed with FACT not assumption by researchers and information just keeps coming to the surface, with this scandal, and the Savile scnadal.  Jimmy Savile was a disk jockey with the BBC.  When he died in 2011 what came out in the wake of it was that he was a historic level paedophile.  What didn't come out was that he procured children for the rich and famous AND he was also an inner circle member of the British Royal Family for decades and a close friend of Charles until death.  . One of the biggest procurers for the rich and famous in America happens to be a close friend of Prince Andrew.  In Britain we have a record-breaking paedo and procurer of children who is a decades long close friend of Charles, and an inner circle member of the royal family to the point where they had him acting as a mediator between Charles and Diana when their marriage was on the rocks.  He's a disk jockey!  But he was more than. that.  Are we being asked to believe that royal connections to Epstein and to Savile who did the same thing on different sides of Atlantic is mere coincidence?  Here 's another co-incidence.  In Savile's own words he was introduced to the "inner sanctum" of the Royal Family in the 1960's by Lord Mount Batten - Prince Charles's  mentor, and Prince Philip's to a degree - and he stayed there for the rest of his life.  Why would Lord Mount Batten introduce a paedophile procurer of children to British Royalty?  He was one.  Exposed years ago.  And recently someone wrote another book, it includes information, documents, from the FBI in which the FBI stated Lord Mount Batten was a paedophile.  The police didn't question Prince Andrew.  The police knew what Savile was doing.  Some of those police covered up for him, but some were trying to nail him, but found that they couldn't get enough on him to charge him and get a prosecution.  The police knew.  The police special branch (who are the royal protection squad!) the MI5 networks, would have known, through all those decades, that Jimmy Savile was a paedophile and procurer of children.  They knew!  And so Savile carried on in the inner fold.  And he was not just a paedophile and child procurer, he was a necrophiliac.  He liked sex with dead bodies.  That's why he famously volunteered as a porter at a Leeds hospital  "'Ow's about that then, what a nice man that Jimmy Savile is" -  no!  He wanted access. to the mortuary!  This death cult network that controls the system governing human society is obsessed with death, that's why they literally sacrifice people, especially children, in their Satanic rituals, this is why they glorify mass death rituals we call "war".  And the British Royal Family are part of it.  Why don't the mainstream media make these connections with Savile's history and all these paedophile and Satanic rings that connect, and connect the dots?   The network of child abuse and satanic rings lock into Capitol Hill big time and into Westminster.  Revelations about a Westminster paedophile ring came out.  And they were connected to the Margaret Thatcher government, Margaret Thatcher being another close friend of Jimmy Savile!  And throughout her time in the conservative party and as Prime Minister, one of her closest aids was Peter Morrison the MP for Chester, who was a KNOWN paedophile! Edwina Currie,  a minister in Thatcher's government, wrote in her diary about the dangers to Thatcher of having a close aid in Morrison as he was a known paedophile.  She describes how Norman Tebbitt the Chairman of the Conservative Party had a conversation with Morrison about being a paedophile!  She said Morrison promised to be "discreet".  So many researchers have been exposing all of these connections for such a very long time.  Carl Beech was heralded as one such exposer, but was 'exposed' as 'fantasist'.  The media then said "it was all fantasy".  No it wasn't fantasy.  Carl just said what all these other researchers have been saying for some twenty years.  Evidence supports it very much now.  But that's ignored, and instead we have all this 'woke' stuff going on, while we have a Head of State in Britain who is only permitted to come from one family bloodline.  What is this family doing having all this power??  How is it that in Britain and many commonwealth countries their Head of State is chosen not by the people, it is chosen by a particular bloodline?  "The Queen? She's got no power really, she is good for tourism."  They have ENORMOUS power.  Language and labels give it away:  "Her Majesty's government"; "Her Majesty's most loyal opposition"; "Her Majesty's Civil Service"; "Her Majesty's Treasury"; "Her Majesty's Customs and Excise".    "Her Majesty's Court Services"... SHE is immune to prosecution!  "Her Majesty's Prison and Probation Service"...yeah, that's where they should be.  "Her Majesty's Passport Office"; even naval ships are called HMS, Her Majesty's Ship!  When MPs get elected by 'the people', they cannot take office unless they pledge an oath of allegiance to the Queen.  MPs have to say this:  "I swear by Almighty God that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, her heirs and successors according to Law.  So help me God".  Not "I swear allegiance to the people who elected me".   Those who refuse to take the oath are barred from participating in any proceedings and they won't receive their salaries.  Under the Parliamentary Oath Act of 1866, any of the peers in the upper chamber of the House of Lords voting without having taken the oath are subject to a penalty, a fine of £500.  Judges in Her Majesty's courts have to swear an oath to the Queen.   The Armed Forces are "Her Majesty's Armed Forces" and at the end of the affirmation in their oath that they must swear to the Queen they have to say:  "I will, duty-bound honestly and faithfully, defend Her Majesty".   Not the people, not the country, no, Her Majesty... "against all enemies and will obey all orders of Her Majesty her heirs and successors".    Oh, the family has got no power really.  When football teams, crowds and other occasions sing the National Anthem, it is not to the country, it is to the Queen, demanding to be "reigned over".   When people take an oath of citizenship:  "I swear, by Almighty God, that on becoming a British Citizen I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II her heirs and successors according to Law" and the Scout Association aged 10 and over have to say: "I promise that I will do my best to do my duty to God and to the Queen".   And the police...the police are "Her Majesty's Inspectorate of Constabulary", and before they can take up a post of employment as police officer they must swear this to the Queen:  "I do solemnly and sincerely declare and affirm that I will well and truly serve the Queen in the office of Constable".  Have you noticed that they have not taken any proceedings against Prince Andrew lately, in the light of all the allegations of what happened in London?   How many people, if they were not part of the Royal Family, would have had allegations like that made against them, and the police say "Oh no we're not going to do anything about it oh no"??  The Royal Family is a law unto itself and it's got to bloody STOP!    Be gone with them.  The House of Lords is part of the royal structure with appointees to oversee laws and legislation.  They are appointed   You can appoint a Lord by giving a wad of notes to a party.  The whole system stinks.  The whole ludicrous hierarchy is designed to serve the tiny few by exploiting the many.   It's a no-no to turn your back on the Queen, you should never turn your gaze away from her for too long, and you can't start a conversation with the Queen, she has to start it.   Meghan Markle who is "woke" has "woked" Prince Harry causing splits in the family...and with the situation with Prince Andrew and what happened with Jimmy Savile should we bring this in - and we should -  the house of cards starts to shake.   Do you know the Queen owns most of the seabeds off the British coast?  She is making another fortune off of the wind farms.  The Queen owns the whales, sturgeons, dolphins and porpoises captured within three miles of the UK coast.  Then there are all the flunkies who are paid a pittance to help the royals get dressed.   We are paying for it, and kids in Britain are going to bed hungry.

I do not consent

Calling all activists, grassroots groups, and all people, the few have an agenda to keep pushing the stuff on the many to destroy us, and are going to keep pushing until you push back - or not, and then you won't Be. They will stop if you push back.  They are counting on you not to. When you speak to Council members, planning commissioners etc. about irradiation by 5G, 4G, whatever,when you give them your talk, at the end always say: "I do not consent."  Simple.  So many testimonials - "this is harming the environment, this is killing people, this is not moral, blah blah blah"... and then they end it.  They have not really stated what they wanted.  You need to be clear on what you don't want. Everybody has an issue that matters to them - the damage to the birds and the bees, the children, the culling of trees, the technology, the surveillance. But the One Glue that bonds all of us together is that One Statement I DO NOT CONSENT. And that must be uttered.  Not just to wireless radiation but to mandatory vaccines, to geo-engineering, to fluoridation, to fracking, to one-on-one technology to robotise our children, to microchipping, whatever.  Start saying No, then the actions will follow. Every single person has the God-given human right on the face of this earth to make the statement Yes or No,  I accept it/I do not accept.  To the "State" you state your statement (state what you meant)  to the government (mind controllers). Our consent is being taken for granted. We very conveniently forgot that's the case.  We have been so suppressed that we are too kind.  Fluoride lulls and comforts you, makes you too pacified to resist. Sit up, be aware, listen to your body. Activate the melatonin present in every cell in the body - turn off the Wi-Fi, get a good night's sleep, and wake up.  Voting, when you go out and vote, you are consenting to being ruled over and if that's what you want then by all means go.  Everything we give consent to, consciously or not, everything is a frequency match to you, and you give your power away by consent, and it all manifests here first as a frequency - in the beginning there was the word.  The word is a sound and sound is frequency. Thoughts are also frequencies and because of the Law of Attraction your inner vibrational reality always resonates with your surroundings.  When you start to change your thoughts and behaviours, after a buffer of time the world around you starts shifting, it is only a matter of time before the outside catches up.  You can change anything in your reality, anything and everything.  Use your intent to manifest - and state your intentions out loud if you want the Matrix to surely read them as the Matrix knows and is listening all the time.  Silence is golden, when you are silent you are consenting, it is implied consent, that's why you must verbalise.    Revoke your agreements, meaning by this everything you don't agree with.  .Stop giving consent and driving this game 😄

The dust has not settled on 9/11

If you never saw the events of 9/11 or never knew the events of that day, if you never heard the official narrative of that day's events as presented by the governments and mainstream media... and you looked at these pictures, would you yourself describe what you are seeing here as a collapse?

Or would you look at this and say: "Poof...gone in a puff of smoke." Is that a collapse there, or is that the building disintegrated? What kind of energy is required?  Is burning kerosene enough to produce that kind of kinetic energy?   Dr Judy Wood B.S. M.S. PhD is a highly brilliant woman.  She made a video called "The New Hiroshima". Everybody should look into her book called "Where did the towers go?" which is full of empirical data with photos.  She jumps to no conclusions, no assumptions, no theories, no he-said-she-said. Just evidence of directed free energy technology used on 9/11.  Everybody should read this book and pay close attention to the evidence that Dr Wood presents...she spoke about the World Trade Centre spire.  Nikola Tesla said that if he let his oscillator continue in his experiments, it would rip away the stone of the concrete sructure of the building first, then it would disintegrate the steel. Dr Wood spoke of a phenomenon which happened to WTC Tower One which was called the "spire" which was about 700 feet tall. A sturdy strong building it would be to still be standing at that height, and it remained standing after the concrete casing peeled away like a banana leaving itself exposed, with crisp edges... with blue sky around it, not dust. The core columns of steel still standing 700 feet in the air, left as skeletal rods in the photos in her book, as they came down, faded. Some of the thickest steel structures ever manufactured in America, went dusty, went faint, and never tipped over in any direction.  If it had tipped over it would have taken out a few blocks' worth of buildings.  Did it drop in a hole in the ground?  If a 700 foot hole to drop into it were there, there wasn't much time for dust to settle on it and looking at the debris pile, there is not enough matter to account for the mass of the buildings.  Why?  people ask.  There are lots of reasons for false flag attacks.  First of all it is to inject fear into the public consciousness.  When people are in fear they don't make good decisions. They will listen to whatever any so-called saviour tells them to do.  Another reason is to invade another country to seize resources justified by the so-called never ending 'war on terror' to create a Homeland Security akin to the Gestapo of Nazi Germany with all the subsequent losses of liberty that go along with it and the rising militarisation of the police.  False flag events have been historically used to sway populations in a certain direction.  Check out the documentary "Shadow Ring" featuring Mark Passio, it explains what false flags are and how they've been used  

We do have free energy

The vision of Tesla free energy for the world is largely scoffed at. People think Tesla's greatest inventions are a pipe dream that never happened. They are not. Tesla's inventions DID come to fruition -  in the wrong hands, and used in ways that never should have been.  Not only weaponised, his technology is being used to create a world that is on lock-down and under complete control.  The world would be a lot different of a place if we were using his free energy for the benefits it should have been used for. They would be freeing technologies that would unite people. We have to understand what the potential of this technology was, and that means looking at all the horrible ways it could be used in the wrong hands.  The answer is to educate people about what is possible  Nikola Tesla Patents

Smart Summoning
A "smart summon feature" is to allow  drivers to summon their vehicles to them in car parks using their smartphones.  Videos have popped up showing the negative consequences of everyday users indulging in Smart Summon in real life, it appears to be nothing short of a disaster. There's an alarming video where a driverless Tesla pulls across a line of live traffic forcing another driver to slam on the brakes. There's been warnings from Tesla owners that Summon isn't safe.

Tesla's Vibrator 
Tesla was known for tinkering with mechanical vibrations and resonance.  In 1898 he toyed with an electromagnetic oscillator that he attached to a structural beam of his loft. He made observations and noted them down. He was unaware that amplified vibrations from the oscillator were travelling through the beam and into the substructure of Manhattan in all directions! Buildings shook, windows shattered.  People poured into the streets thinking this was an earthquake. As soon as Tesla realized what was happening he smashed up the oscillator and quit the experiment. Tesla then did another experiment with an oscillator about the size of an alarm clock that he attached to a two ft long, two inches thick steel beam.  He reported that nothing happened for a long time until finally the steel link started trembling until it dilated and contracted like a beating heart, and then snapped. A fusillade of taps that wouldn't harm a baby managed to achieve what sledgehammers could not. Tesla furthered his experiments with this, attaching one of his oscillators to a steel beam of a skyscraper which was still under construction near Wall Street. He reported feeling the beam trembling within minutes. The trembling increased in intensity and extended throughout all the steel. The structure began to creak and weave, and the panic-stricken thought that the building was about to collapse. Tesla stopped it in time and left the site. He reported that if he had left it for ten more minutes the building would have fallen flat. His vibrator could have dropped Brooklyn Bridge in less than an hour, he said.  Tesla told newspaper reporters that his vibrating devices would be able to “reduce the Empire State Building to a tangled mass of wreckage in a very short time. First the outer stone coating of the skyscraper would be hurled off. Then the whole vast skeleton of steel, the pride and glory of the Manhattan skyline, would collapse.”

Scalar Waves

In 1899 at his laboratory in Colorado Springs Tesla experimented with scalar waves - other technology that has been used in ways it never should have been. Tesla was he re-discoverer of scalar waves, waves that flow at right angles to electromagnetic waves which are considered to be finer than gamma rays or X-rays. Scalar waves belong to the subtle gravitational field, known as gravitic waves or longitudinal waves.  From these experiments he learned how to harness scalar waves from one transmitter to another wirelessly. Tesla later built a prototype of this magnifying transmitter at Shoreham, Long Island, New York.  Tesla’s funding for this project was revoked after his financial backer, J.P. Morgan, realized that Tesla’s World Wireless system would destroy his business profits by allowing people to tap into free energy at no cost.  Tesla later discovered that scalar energy becomes “bottled” from the intersection of two scalar waves. Interferometry is a technique of crossing scalar wave beams. Through this, large standing waves can be combined to produce a focused “beam” of extremely powerful energy. Interferometry can combine several scalar waves sent from different transmitters to produce a plasma “bottle” of very highly contained energy. This “bottle” or “shield” could be moved around the planet at will, and the bottled energy could even be detonated remotely. If detonated in the earth, it can produce an earthquake. If detonated in a building or a city, the result would be an explosion with such violence on a nuclear scale without any resulting radiation, which would disintegrate all matter within the “bottle.”  This is the Tesla “Death Ray” that could project the energy of a nuclear warhead and direct it to any location in the world. Some say the massive explosion in Tunguska, Siberia in 1908 may have been a test of this technology. The force of the Tunguska explosion was estimated to have been 10-15 megatons. The blast flattened half a million acres of forest. It is rumoured that Tesla may have been trying to break ice at the polar circle during the test.  Tesla considered further experiments with scalar wave technology too dangerous, obviously, he knew that scalar waves could be used to trigger earthquakes or used as remote disintegration weapons.   Thomas Bearden B.S M.S. PhD has done extensive work about scalar interferometry.  H.A.A.R.P., the High Altitude Active Auroral Research Project in Alaska,  is scalar wave technology that has been used for all the wrong reasons such as modification of weather. It can be weaponsied for the production of artificial earthquakes.   So Nikola Tesla made the decision before his death to divide his lifelong research over multiple locations in different countries in a bid to prevent any one one country gaining advantage over the rest of the world by weaponizing the technology. After Tesla died in 1943, the FBI and other agencies in America seized nearly two trucks' worth of his papers and suppressed his documents and made them Top Secret.  The excuse was so they wouldn't 'fall into enemy hands'.  This technology DID in fact fall into enemy hands called 'government'.  It was used on 11th September 2001.  
Dr Judy Wood: "Where Did The Towers Go?