At 10 am on Monday 9th May 2011, truth activist John Anthony Hill aka Muad’Dib, stood for pre-trial in an unusual case at Southwark Crown Court, 1 English Grounds, City of London, London. Nothing like this has ever been seen before. He had been accused of ‘attempting to pervert the course of justice’, and threatened with a life sentence, because he tried to prevent innocent men from going to jail for the London 7/7/2005 tube station bombings (UK’s version of 9/11), because he sent copies of his film to the Chief Constable of Birmingham, and the CC of West Yorkshire, the Chief of Police at the police station where the accused innocent men were from in Leeds, TV stations, hundreds of mosques, and to everyone he could think of to prevent a miscarriage of justice and report misprision of treason. There was never a response or investigation. In fact, there was a response, and that was to accuse him of attempting to pervert the course of justice when he was striving to prevent a perversion of the course of justice perpetrated by the British Government against the British people, by exposing this for the false flag that it was which it does in his film 7/7 Ripple Effect. John Anthony Hill used the name “Muad’Dib”’ in the film, Arabic for ‘to educate’ or teacher of righteousness. In that tube bombing there were 56 murdered that day and about 800 injured and maimed. He was trying to get the crime investigated. He wanted to stop the government that carries out these atrocities and who don’t want themselves investigated. He sent DVDs of 7/7 Rippple Effect as an Amicus Curiae Brief (meaning friend of the court who is not directly involved in its case) to educate the court (http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8756795263359807776), where three men stood accused of aiding the four alleged bombers. The British government and mainstream media all work for the same person... the queen. The New World Order troopers came after him. The BBC rubbished his character. His home in Ireland was raided. He was extradited to the UK as a ‘terrorist’. He was incarcerated for 150 days. This day in court was not the trial for the actual charge; it was a pre-trial for an application he’d made, an application that he not be tried by the crown for the following reason: he was challenging the jurisdiction of the Crown and her sovereignty, exposing the fraudulent and corrupted monarch of Elizabeth Alexandra Mary Battenberg - stating that, as she is a fraud, and all of the courts are "her majesty's" courts and all of the judges have sworn an oath to her and draw their authority from her, then NONE of the courts are operating lawfully since they gain their authority from her. Therefore the crown has no authority to put him or any defendant on trial. This was because he believed her to have been crowned upon a fake coronation stone; British monarchy is descended from King David and that the Stone of Destiny is Jacob’s Pillar and the Throne of David, and they know it because they have evidence in their possession. The real Coronation Stone (“National Treasure No. 1”) was taken to Scotland. And, even if she HAD been lawfully crowned in the first place, she has broken her oath thousands of times, and she was no longer the monarch with immediate effect after the first time she broke that oath. The judge noted down what Muad’Dib said. He said that Elizabeth, as Head of the Church of England, took the particular version of the sovereign Bible - a specially bound edition of the king James version (1611) of the Holy Bible, in her right hand and swore the Coronation Oath upon it and then kissed it, before she signed the oath in Westminster Abbey swearing to maintain to the upmost of her power the laws of God in Deuteronomy Chapter 4 that prohibit mankind from legislating. (His point has always been that she deceived the people into believing that they (the system/the Crown) have right to legislate and rip everyone else off putting the people in poverty and putting them in jail for stealing a loaf of bread to feed their family while they further bolster up their obscene wealth, having stolen billions; and her contract with the British people she has broken it, over and over endlessly.) Muad’Dib had filed a witness application to have her come to court with his hearing and wanted to cross examine her. A corrupt judge that dealt with the case a month ago ruled that the witness subpoenas that Muad’Dib Hill sought (to bring a material eye-witness and hard evidence into court) ‘weren’t relevant to his case’. (The subpoena applications were denied to suit their cover-up.) The paperwork stating that the applications had been denied went to the wrong address ‘in error’. That meant that Muad’Dib (John) never received them until the last minute when he was traveling to court. The judge presiding over the pre-trial on this day was a separate one, but instead of being impartial, he refused to hear the evidence of the necessity of these witness summonses. He said they were not ‘relevant’. He merely said that if it they had been denied by another judge, they were denied. He used the words ‘your skeletal argument’ a lot. The judge called several breaks, and kept at bay dealing with the key issues. It was all ‘procedures’, procedures, procedures. As Muad’Dib was to challenge the Crown’s authority to prosecute him, a challenge of that nature needed a Jury, said Muad’Dib. The judge rejected it and denied Muad’Dib’s right to a jury. The prosecutor said that the stone had no bearing on the queen’s position whether it be fake or not as it was ceremonial. The barrister speaking in Muad’Dib’s defense inserted that Muad’Dib had a DVD of the queen’s coronation (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LxuYJ1Udm5E) to put on in the court as evidence. The judge asked how long it would be. He kept on insisting that time was of the essence. Muad’Dib said the relevant part lasted 18 minutes, and the DVD was played, but the sound was next to inaudible. The judge listened on a separate monitor set. The judge’s face was absolutely transfixed by it and very solemn, absorbing everything. He thanked Muad’Dib for presenting it, and also said he could just about hear it otherwise he would have refused to agree to play it. Was the sound set up to fail? So, with that, and no jury, it was left for the judge to dictate that he would decide whether he accepts or turns down Muad’Dib’s application (application that the Crown has no authority to bring charges in this case); and if the judge rules that the Crown has no authority, (accepts the application) charges will be dropped; if he rules no (does not accept the application) the trial continues. The judge refused to give a ruling straight away that day. He said he’d have to consider the matter overnight, and ordered Muad’Dib to be back in court the following morning at 10 am. Muad’Dib’s friends have put up a website http://mtrial.org/. The court was packed out with people who had come to support Muad’Dib, enough that they had to bunch up together, some sitting on each other’s lap to find a seat, and for some reason the judge did not like it; he spat out his own officious sounding justification, and he kicked them out except for those sitting in the public gallery. The ones who had to go out said to the ones sat in the public gallery as they walked past, that if they didn’t leave, the judge would have kicked everyone out. He was taciturn and authoritarian; when he saw a woman presumably texting on her mobile phone he ordered her ‘Madam, you will leave the court immediately, I will not say it again!’ It was like being in a classroom where Court treats human beings like children, chattel, assets which are considered corporations due to the fraud of birth certificates. That’s why Muad-Dib couldn’t have his common law jury. A ‘court’ is a place where a game is played like tennis and the system that set you up knows the rules and wins. Courts are private unlawful companies that don’t solely operate on common law but use and abuse Maritime admiralty law, the law of contracts, the law of the seas; and as soon as you step into the ‘dock’ you’ve entered deep water and have stepped into their jurisdiction, and you’re in with sharks that own the ocean and swallow you up. The Queen's trained lawyers and QC's are trained in legal ease and subversion techniques. They would never deviate from the script. And they, like the politicians and police, have sworn an oath only to the queen and her law societies, and NEVER have sworn a public oath to protect human beings. The B.A.R. association serves her. B.A.R. stands for "British Accreditation Registry". She is the head of all of the Commonwealth countries so it affects Canada, Australia, Ireland, New Zealand – she controls the U.S. as well through the banks and the legal system. The Bank of England and the Federal Reserve is owned by the same. It’ll be a circus when the veil lifts on the other truths about the royals being a dark, multi-generational satanic family. Queen Detritus is a vicious dictator and is the head of the NWO and population control via poisoning. Bill Gates admits vaccines are being used for human depopulation. ‘The Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Committee of 300’ is a book written by Dr John Coleman, an ex-MI6 operative who, during the course of his work, gained access to documents that he believes they did not mean him to have seen. In these documents he found out about this conspiracy. Search him on YouTube; he gives talks about what he knows from within the system. The book reveals a committee of 300 elite people from elite families who are trying to bring about a New World Order and who actually rule the world, and Queen Elizabeth is the head of it all. The gloves have come off her; see the hands and the false reality, and the risen evil at the top. The way to take the New World Order viper down is to decapitate it. Break the legislative stranglehold and spread the word. It’s time to fight or die.
